Dukungan Budaya Organisasi Ambidextrous dan Persahabatan di Tempat Kerja terhadap Perilaku Kerja Inovatif PNS

Nadia Khaerunnisa, Arum Etikariena

Abstract


Kualitas hubungan tidak hanya menstimulasi inovasi secara langsung, tetapi juga secara tidak langsung melalui aktivitas sosial (Morales et al., 2020; Xu & Suntrayuth, 2022). Selain itu, budaya yang mampu menyeimbangkan proses eksploitasi dan eksplorasi (ambidextrous) serta perilaku inventif dinilai memengaruhi keberhasilan organisasi (Kandoth & Shekhar, 2024). Hubungan persahabatan menjadi salah satu sarana sosial yang dapat merangsang perilaku inovatif, di antaranya melalui keamanan psikologis (Cao & Zhang, 2020). Namun, masih ditemukan inkonsistensi dalam hubungan tersebut (Durrah, 2023). Penelitian ini memastikan mekanisme perilaku kerja inovatif dalam kerangka social identity theory pada 354 pegawai negeri sipil (PNS) di Indonesia. Data yang diperoleh secara cross-sectional dianalisis menggunakan Hayes Process Model 14 dengan bantuan software IBM SPSS Statistics 26. Hasilnya, hubungan pertemanan di tempat kerja dan perilaku kerja inovatif bersifat tidak langsung. Keamanan psikologis secara penuh memediasi hubungan keduanya. Efek mediasi ini bervariasi tergantung seberapa tinggi budaya organisasi ambidextrous dirasakan oleh para pegawai.  Tidak hanya menambah kebaruan teoritis, implikasi praktis penelitian ini juga berguna bagi penyusunan strategi pemerintah untuk mewujudkan PNS Indonesia yang semakin inovatif.


Keywords


Budaya Organisasi Ambidextrous; Keamanan Psikologis; Perilaku Kerja Inovatif; Persahabatan; Sektor Publik.

Full Text:

PDF

References


AlMunthiri, O., Bani-Melhem, S., Mohd-Shamsudin, F. and Raziq, M.M. (2023). "Fostering innovative behaviours of public sector employees: the potency of innovation-based HR practices, risk propensity and error tolerance". International Journal of Public Sector Management. https://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2075/10.1108/IJPSM-08-2023-0242

Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Academy of Management Review, 1989, Vol. 14, No. 1, 20-39.

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

Bernards. (2024). Cognitive Uncertainty and Employees’ Daily Innovative Work Behavior: The Moderating Role of Ambidextrous Leadership. Review of Public Personnel Administration 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X241233759

Humas MenpanRB. Situs JIPPNas kini telah resmi dikelola bersama tiga instansi. Diakses di https://menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/situs-jippnas-kini-telah-resmi-dikelola-bersama-tiga-instansi / tanggal 16 November 2024

BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2024). Keadaaan Pekerja di Indonesia Februari 2024. Katalog: 2303006, ISSN 1979-7702. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Cao, F. & Zhang, H. (2020). Workplace friendship, psychological safety and innovative behavior in China, a moderated-mediation model. Chinese Management Studies Vol. 14 No. 3, 2020 pp. 661-676. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-09-2019-0334

Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654

Crano, W.D., Brewer, M.B., Lac, A. (2024). Principles and Methods of Social Research 4th Edition. New York: Routledge.

Durrah, Omar. (2023). Do we need friendship in the workplace? The effect on innovative behavior and mediating role of psychological safety. Current Psychology 42:28597–28610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03949-4

Edmondson, Amy; Higgins, Monica; Singer, Sara; Weiner, Jennie. (2016). Understanding Psychological Safety in Health Care and Education Organizations: A Comparative Perspective. Research in Human Development. 13. 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2016.1141280

Elsayed et al. (2023). The role of error risk taking and perceived organizational innovation climate in the relationship between perceived psychological safety and innovative work behavior: A moderated mediation model. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1042911

Etikariena, A., & Muluk, H. (2014). Correlation between Organizational Memory and Innovative Work Behavior. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 18(2), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v18i2.3463

Fasbender, U., Burmeister, A., & Wang, M. (2023). Managing the risks and side effects of workplace friendships: The moderating role of workplace friendship self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior 143 (2023) 10387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103875

Gallup. (2018). How Having a Best Friend at Work Transforms the Workplace. https://www.gallup.com/cliftonstrengths/en/249605/having-best-friend-work-transforms-workplace.aspx

Hayes, Andrew F. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, A Regression-Based Approach 3rd Edition. New York: The Guilford Press.

He P, Wang J, Zhou H, Zhang C, Liu Q and Xie X. (2022). Workplace friendship, employee well-being and knowledge hiding: The moderating role of the perception of Chaxu climate. Front. Psychol. 13:1036579. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1036579

Iswahyudi, D., & Etikariena, A. (2024). Unleashing Leaders’ Innovative Work Behavior in EnergyCompany: The Role of Business Acumen andInnovative Self-Efficacy. Japanese Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.125642024

Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and organizational psychology, 73(3), 287-302. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1348/096317900167038

Kandoth, S., & Shekhar, S. K. (2024). Employees’ intrinsic motivation in mediating the relationship between perceived ambidextrous organizational culture and innovative behaviour in the Indian IT sector. The Learning Organization. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-03-2024-0089

Lambriex-Schmitz, P., Van der Klink, M.R., Beausaert, S., Bijker, M. and Segers, M. (2020a). “Towards successful innovations in education: development and validation of a multi-dimensional Innovative Work Behaviour Instrument”. Vocations and Learning, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 313-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-020-09242-4

Lee JY, Seo Y, Jeung W, Kim J. (2019). How ambidextrous organizational culture affects job performance: A multilevel study of the mediating effect of psychological capital. Journal of Management & Organization. 2019;25(6):860-875. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.38

Liu, S., Hu, J., Li, Y., Wang, Z., & Lin, X. (2014). Examining the cross-level relationship between shared leadership and learning in teams: Evidence from China. The leadership quarterly, 25(2), 282-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.006

Lukitasari, Dania; Etikariena, Arum. (2024). Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior: The Mediation-Moderation Model of Ambidextrous Culture. Psikologika. https://doi.org/10.20885/jstl.vol29.iss2.art5

Memon et al. (2020). Sample size for survey research: review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling: 4(2), i-xx, June 2020. eISSN: 2590-4221

Mogård EV, Rørstad OB, Bang H. (2022). The Relationship between Psychological Safety and Management Team Effectiveness: The Mediating Role of Behavioral Integration. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20(1):406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010406

Morales et al. (2020). How helping behaviours at work stimulate innovation in the organization: evidence from a moderated-mediation model. Innovation, 22:1, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1632712

Narsa, Niluh Putu. (2018). Inovasi Pelayanan: Telaah Literatur Perbandingan Sektor Privat dan Sektor Publik. Berkala Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia. 3. 46-62. 10.20473/baki.v3i2.9871.

Nielsen, I.K., Jex, S.M., & Adams, G.A. (2000). Development and validation of scores on a two-dimensional workplace friendship scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 60 No. 4, August 2000 628-643

Pillemer, J. and Rothbard, N.P. (2018), “Friends without benefits: understanding the dark sides of workplace friendship”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 635-660. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0309

Priyanka; Mahima, Jain; Sanjay, Dhir. (2022). Antecedents of organization ambidexterity: A comparative study of public and private sector organizations. Technology in Society. Vol. 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102046

Rachmawati, T. S., Sukmawat, A., & Nurhayati, P. (2024). Employee readiness in implementing the core values of the Indonesian government organization “BerAKHLAK.” Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 15(2), 104–124.

Riaz et al. (2023). An augmentation for innovation: psycho-Tech innovative work behavior model through an intellectual risk-taking pathway. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36:3, 2256830. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2023.2256830

Schein, E.H. & Schein, P. (2017). Organizational Culture and Leadership. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Taherdoost, Hamed. (2016). Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management. 5. 28-36. 10.2139/ssrn.3205040

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-37). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Thneibat, Motasem M. (2023). The impact of high commitment work practices on radical innovation: innovative work behaviour and knowledge sharing as mediators. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2023-0036

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara.

Wang, C.L. and Rafiq, M. (2014), Contextual Ambidexterity. Brit J Manage, 25: 58-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x

Wyandini, D.Z., Kosasih, H.M.E., & Faridah, I. (2023). Does Workplace Friendship Contribute Toward Work Engagement among Employee of West Java’s Industrial Area?. Indonesian Psychological Research Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.29080/ipr.v5i1.879

Xu, Z., & Suntrayuth, S. (2022). Innovative work behavior in high-tech enterprises: Chain intermediary effect of psychological safety and knowledge sharing. Frontiers in Psychology, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017121

Zhang, S., Ke, X., Frank Wang, X.-H. and Liu, J. (2018), Empowering leadership and employee creativity: A dual-mechanism perspective. J Occup Organ Psychol, 91: 896-917. https://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2075/10.1111/joop.12219

Zhang, W., Zeng, X., Liang, H., Xue, Y., & Cao, X. (2023). Understanding how organizational culture affects innovation performance: a management context perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086644




DOI: https://doi.org/10.51849/j-p3k.v5i3.527

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


slot dana

slot